Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspen Grove

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aspen Grove

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came across this while checking to see if Aspen Grove, British Columbia could be moved. I don't believe that the article is particularly notable and a Google search didn't really seem to turn up anything. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:02, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:51, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:51, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There's an article in Urban Land, but Google only shows a snippet. I also found references to a dog wedding there. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:51, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 03:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 01:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Despite Eastmain's good work. A mass dog wedding really should spell automatic notability, but I'm just not feeling it. Drmies (talk) 01:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable centre, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 01:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails WP:GNG. In the scheme of things the dog wedding adds only a little of notability but there appears to be no other significant coverage of the centre itself. LibStar (talk) 03:18, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.